FEK korxonalarini barqaror rivojlantirish: inson kapitalini boshqarish asosida biznes jarayonlarini modellashtirish
##semicolon##
barqaror rivojlanishumumiy vergul ro'yxat seperatori yoqilg‘i-energetika kompleksiumumiy vergul ro'yxat seperatori inson kapitaliumumiy vergul ro'yxat seperatori dinamik modellashtirishumumiy vergul ro'yxat seperatori yumshoq tizimlar metodologiyasiumumiy vergul ro'yxat seperatori biznes jarayonlari##article.abstract##
Maqola yoqilg‘i-energetika kompleksining (YEK) barqaror rivojlanishida inson kapitalining rolini tahlil qilishga
bag‘ishlangan va boshqaruv jarayonlarini dinamik modellashtirish vositasi sifatida Yumshoq Tizimlar Metodologiyasi (SSM)
ko‘rib chiqiladi. Ish doirasida yoqilg‘i-energetika kompleksini barqaror rivojlantirish va bu jarayonda inson kapitalining
o‘rni mavzusiga oid adabiyotlar ko‘rib chiqildi va inson kapitalining mohiyati va mohiyatini tushunishga turli yondashuvlar
ko‘rib chiqildi. Muallifl ar inson kapitalining barqaror rivojlanishga ko‘p qirrali ta’sirini ko‘rsatuvchi tadqiqotlarni tahlil qilib,
yoqilg‘i-energetika kompleksi kontekstida uni o‘rganish va boshqarish muhimligini ta’kidlaydilar. Maqolada inson kapitalini
boshqarishning o‘zaro bog‘liq biznes jarayonlarini ko'rsatadigan kontseptual model taklif etiladi. Model xodimlarga bo‘lgan
ehtiyojni aniqlashdan tortib, xodimlarning kompaniyadan ketishini boshqarishgacha bo‘lgan biznes jarayonlarini tahlil qilish
va optimallashtirishni o‘z ichiga oladi. Kadrlar rivojlanishining asosiy bosqichlari, jumladan, ekologik va ijtimoiy mas’uliyat
sohalarida tavsifl angan. Bu jarayonlarning faolligi, yoqilg‘i-energetika korxonalarining barqaror rivojlanishiga ta’siriga alohida
e’tibor qaratilmoqda. Muallifl ar inson kapitalini boshqarishga kompleks yondashuv muhimligini ta’kidlaydilar, bunda
rasmiy va norasmiy jihatlarni hisobga olish kerak.
##submission.citations##
Кончакова Л.Н., Чугунова С.В. Человеческий капитал и инвестиции в человеческий капитал предприятия // Актуальные проблемы авиации и космонавтики. 2017. Т. 3. № 13. С. 48-50.
Чигоряев К.Н., Скопинцева Н.А., Ульященко В.В. Оценка стоимости человеческого капитала на основе произведенных затрат // Известия Томского политехнического университета. 2008. Т. 313. №6. С. 54-56.
Thurow L. Investment in Human Capital. Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1970. 145 p.
Romer, P.M. (1986) Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth // Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037.
Romer, P. M. (1990). Capital, labor, and productivity. Brookings papers on economic activity. Microeconomics, 1990, 337-367.
Lucas, R.E. (1988). On the Mechanics of Economic Development // Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
Hanushek, E. A., Ruhose, J., & Woessmann, L. (2015). Human capital quality and aggregate income differences: Development accounting for US states;
Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2021). Education and economic growth. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance.
Checkland P., Poulter J. Soft systems methodology // Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide. 2020. Pp. 201-253.
Hildbrand S., Bodhanya S. Applying SSM to explore the complexity in a multi-stakeholder setting // Journal of Contemporary Management. 2014. Vol. 11. Iss. 1. Pp. 406-430.
Wang W., Liu W., Mingers J. A systemic method for organisational stakeholder identification and analysis using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) // European Journal of Operational Research. 2015. Vol. 246. Iss. 2. Pp. 562-574.
Rosenberg Z., Riasanow T., Krcmar H. A system dynamics model for business process change projects // International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. 2015. Pp. 1-27.
Wang M., Zhou L., Zhang Z. Dynamic modeling // Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. 2016. Vol. 3. Pp. 241-266.
Alefari M., Almanei M., Salonitis K. A system dynamics model of employees’ performance // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. Iss. 16. DOI: 10.3390/su12166511
Jiang G., Hu B., Wang Y. Agent-based simulation approach to understanding the interaction between employee behavior and dynamic tasks // Simulation. 2011. Vol. 87. Iss. 5. Pp. 407-422.
Yim N.H., Kim S.H., Kim H.W., Kwahk K.Y. Knowledge based decision making on higher level strategic concerns: system dynamics approach // Expert Systems with Applications. 2004. Vol. 27. Iss. 1. Pp. 143-158.
Groesser S.N., Jovy N. Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making // Journal of Management Control. 2016. Vol. 27. Pp. 61-88.
Vennix J. A. Building consensus in strategic decision making: system dynamics as a group support system // Group decision and negotiation. 1995. Vol. 4. Pp. 335-355.
Afanas’ev M. P., Shash N. N. ESG Transformation in the Corporate Sector: Systematizing the Global Approach // Studies on Russian Economic Development. 2022. Vol. 33. Iss. 6. Pp 707-715.
Pérez L., Hunt V., Samandari H., Nuttall R., Bellone D. How to make ESG real. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2022.
Chevrollier N., Zhang J., van Leeuwen T., Nijhof A. The predictive value of strategic orientation for ESG performance over time // Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. 2022. Vol. 20. Iss. 1. Pp. 123-142. DOI: 10.1108/CG-03-2019-0105
